PLoS ONE · 2016 · 12 citations · 25 references
Numerical AnalysisEngineeringNeurolinguisticsCognitionBoundary Condition 3Social SciencesBoundary Condition 1Boundary ConditionsFixed-point PropertyMixture AnalysisDiscrete MathematicsCognitive NeurosciencePsychophysicsStatisticsBehavioral SciencesCognitive ScienceInverse ProblemsComputer ScienceProbability TheoryBinary Mixture DataHuman CognitionExperimental PsychologyFunctional Data AnalysisMixture DistributionCognitive Modeling
The notion of "mixtures" has become pervasive in behavioral and cognitive sciences, due to the success of dual-process theories of cognition. However, providing support for such dual-process theories is not trivial, as it crucially requires properties in the data that are specific to mixture of cognitive processes. In theory, one such property could be the fixed-point property of binary mixture data, applied-for instance- to response times. In that case, the fixed-point property entails that response time distributions obtained in an experiment in which the mixture proportion is manipulated would have a common density point. In the current article, we discuss the application of the fixed-point property and identify three boundary conditions under which the fixed-point property will not be interpretable. In Boundary condition 1, a finding in support of the fixed-point will be mute because of a lack of difference between conditions. Boundary condition 2 refers to the case in which the extreme conditions are so different that a mixture may display bimodality. In this case, a mixture hypothesis is clearly supported, yet the fixed-point may not be found. In Boundary condition 3 the fixed-point may also not be present, yet a mixture might still exist but is occluded due to additional changes in behavior. Finding the fixed-property provides strong support for a dual-process account, yet the boundary conditions that we identify should be considered before making inferences about underlying psychological processes.
25
Roger Ratcliff · Psychological Review · 1978 · 4.1K citations
Memory Retrieval, Neurolinguistics, Item Response Theory +19