Efficiency of acidemia correction on intermittent versus continuous hemodialysis in acute methanol poisoning

Sergey Zakharov, Daniela Pelclová, Tomáš Navrátil, Jaromír Běláček, Jiří Latta, Michal Pisar, Jan Rulíšek, Jiri Leps, Pavel Zidek, Cyril Kucera,

Clinical Toxicology · 2016 · 27 citations · 27 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

Abstract

CONTEXT: Acidemia is a marker of prognosis in methanol poisoning, as well as compounding formate-induced cytotoxicity. Prompt correction of acidemia is a key treatment of methanol toxicity and methods to optimize this are poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: We studied the efficiency of acidemia correction by intermittent hemodialysis (IHD) and continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in a mass outbreak of methanol poisoning. METHODS: were determined in IHD- and CRRT-treated patients. RESULTS: was 5.67 ± 0.90 mmol/L/h for IHD versus 2.17 ± 0.74 mmol/L/h for CRRT (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study supports the superiority of IHD over CRRT in terms of the rate of acidemia correction.

References

27