Publication | Closed Access
Phase I Study of GDC-0425, a Checkpoint Kinase 1 Inhibitor, in Combination with Gemcitabine in Patients with Refractory Solid Tumors
70
Citations
18
References
2016
Year
<b>Purpose:</b> Chk1 inhibition potentiates DNA-damaging chemotherapy by overriding cell-cycle arrest and genome repair. This phase I study evaluated the Chk1 inhibitor GDC-0425 given in combination with gemcitabine to patients with advanced solid tumors.<b>Experimental Design:</b> Patients received GDC-0425 alone for a 1-week lead-in followed by 21-day cycles of gemcitabine plus GDC-0425. Gemcitabine was initially administered at 750 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (Arm A), then increased to 1,000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> (Arm B), on days 1 and 8 in a 3 + 3 + 3 dose escalation to establish maximum tolerated dose (MTD). GDC-0425 was initially administered daily for three consecutive days; however, dosing was abbreviated to a single day on the basis of pharmacokinetics and tolerability. <i>TP53</i> mutations were evaluated in archival tumor tissue. On-treatment tumor biopsies underwent pharmacodynamic biomarker analyses.<b>Results:</b> Forty patients were treated with GDC-0425. The MTD of GDC-0425 was 60 mg when administered approximately 24 hours after gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m<sup>2</sup> Dose-limiting toxicities included thrombocytopenia (<i>n</i> = 5), neutropenia (<i>n</i> = 4), dyspnea, nausea, pyrexia, syncope, and increased alanine aminotransferase (<i>n</i> = 1 each). Common related adverse events were nausea (48%); anemia, neutropenia, vomiting (45% each); fatigue (43%); pyrexia (40%); and thrombocytopenia (35%). The GDC-0425 half-life was approximately 15 hours. There were two confirmed partial responses in patients with triple-negative breast cancer (<i>TP53</i>-mutated) and melanoma (<i>n</i> = 1 each) and one unconfirmed partial response in a patient with cancer of unknown primary origin.<b>Conclusions:</b> Chk1 inhibition with GDC-0425 in combination with gemcitabine was tolerated with manageable bone marrow suppression. The observed preliminary clinical activity warrants further investigation of this chemopotentiation strategy. <i>Clin Cancer Res; 23(10); 2423-32. ©2016 AACR</i>.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1