MR-compatibility of a high-resolution small animal PET insert operating inside a 7 T MRI

Jonathan D. Thiessen, Ehsan Shams, Greg Stortz, Graham Schellenberg, D. Bishop, Muhammad Salman Khan, F. Retière, Vesna Sossi, Christopher J. Thompson, Andrew L. Goertzen

Physics in Medicine and Biology · 2016 · 24 citations · 36 references

Concepts

Abstract

field maps or the image homogeneity of various MR images, with a 9% decrease in the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) observed only in EPI images acquired with the PET insert installed and operating. PET detector flood histograms, photopeak amplitudes, and energy resolutions were unchanged in individual PET detector modules when acquired during MRI operation. There was a small baseline shift on the PET detector signals due to the switching amplifiers used to power MRI gradient pulses. This baseline shift was observable when measured with an oscilloscope and varied as a function of the gradient duty cycle, but had no noticeable effect on the performance of the PET detector modules. Compact front-end electronics and effective RF shielding led to minimal cross-interference between the PET and MRI systems. Both PET detector and MRI performance was excellent, whether operating as a standalone system or a hybrid PET/MRI.

References

36