Publication | Closed Access
Failure of Risk-Adjustment by Test Method for <i>C. difficile</i> Laboratory-Identified Event Reporting
24
Citations
7
References
2016
Year
Safety ScienceRisk AnalysisInfection RatioAntimicrobial StewardshipAdverse EventTest MethodHealthcare-associated InfectionRisk ManagementClinical EpidemiologyManagementInfection ControlPublic HealthStatisticsHospital EpidemiologyGeneral EpidemiologyNaat Versus EiaReliabilityInfectious Disease EpidemiologyDisease Risk AssessmentHealth Risk AssessmentRiskClinical Infectious DiseaseClinical MicrobiologyEpidemiologyRisk AssessmentAntibioticsPathogenesisPatient SafetyTime-varying ConfoundingNucleic Acid AmplificationRisk Analysis (Business)MedicineRisk Decisions
Using an algorithm including both enzyme immunoassay (EIA) and nucleic acid amplification (NAAT) for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) diagnosis, we found that the use of NAAT versus EIA almost doubled our hospital-onset CDI laboratory-identified (LabID) event standardized infection ratio (SIR). We recommend that the current risk adjustment approach be modified. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016:1-3.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1