Publication | Open Access
A Comparative Cost – Effectiveness Analysis in Different Tested Aquaponic Systems
22
Citations
6
References
2016
Year
Rainbow TroutAquatic Food SystemAquacultural EngineeringEngineeringEnvironmental EngineeringAquacultureAquacultural SystemsAquatic SustainabilityAgricultural EconomicsStellate SturgeonAquaculture SystemWater QualityCost EffectivenessFish FarmingMaricultureProfit MaximizationEnvironmentally Sustainable AquacultureAquatic Animal Nutrition
One of the main global priorities nowadays is finding sustainable methods of increasing food production. However, profit maximization remains the primary purpose of every economic activity. The integration of aquaculture recirculating systems with different aquaponics techniques comes as a respond to both requirements that were mentioned above. The aim of present research is to make a comparative cost effectiveness analysis in two integrated aquaponics systems, where both deep water culture (DWC) and light expanded clay aggregate (LECA) substrate aquaponic techniques were applied. Four combinations of fish and plants species were used as follows: rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) – spinach (Spinacia oleracea), stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) – spinach (Spinacia oleracea), stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) – mint (Mentha piperita) and stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) – tarragon (Artemisa dracunculus L.). Three production scales were used for the first two mentioned fish to plants combinations, as follows: 59crops/m2; 48crops/m2 and 39crops/m2. For each experiment, the cost analysis includes capital costs and operational costs. As main conclusions, we can point out that LECA substrate aquaponics technique requires a higher investment cost, comparing with DWC technique, but also had generated higher incomes, which led in the end to better economic indicators. The combination of fish to plants stellate sturgeon (Acipenser stellatus) – spinach (Spinacia oleracea), produced by applying LECA substrate aquaponics technique, had proved to be the most economic feasible, from all tested variants. It is recommended that alternative variants for power to be implemented, in order to minimize the electricity operational costs and therefore, to improve the profitability of tested facilities.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1