Publication | Open Access
Optimal Signal Quality Index for Photoplethysmogram Signals
297
Citations
25
References
2016
Year
EngineeringMeasurementRemote Patient MonitoringMobile DevicesWearable TechnologyElectrophysiological EvaluationBiosignal ProcessingPatient MonitoringBiostatisticsPhotoplethysmogram SignalsCardiologyStatisticsRadiologyHealth SciencesCardiovascular ImagingLinear Discriminant AnalysisMedical ImagingSensor Signal ProcessingSignal ProcessingSkewness IndexHealth MonitoringElectrophysiologyAnesthesiology
A photoplethysmogram (PPG) is a noninvasive circulatory signal, but PPG collected via mobile devices is prone to artifacts that can lead to misleading diagnoses. The study aims to develop an optimal signal quality index (SQI) to classify PPG signal quality from mobile devices. Eight SQIs based on perfusion, kurtosis, skewness, relative power, non‑stationarity, zero crossing, entropy, and systolic wave matching were evaluated on 106 recordings annotated as excellent, acceptable, or unfit, using Mahalanobis distance, LDA, QDA, and SVM with leave‑one‑out cross‑validation. The skewness index achieved the highest performance, with F1 scores of 86.0% for excellent vs acceptable, 87.2% for acceptable vs unfit, and 79.1% for unfit recordings.
A photoplethysmogram (PPG) is a noninvasive circulatory signal related to the pulsatile volume of blood in tissue and is typically collected by pulse oximeters. PPG signals collected via mobile devices are prone to artifacts that negatively impact measurement accuracy, which can lead to a significant number of misleading diagnoses. Given the rapidly increased use of mobile devices to collect PPG signals, developing an optimal signal quality index (SQI) is essential to classify the signal quality from these devices. Eight SQIs were developed and tested based on: perfusion, kurtosis, skewness, relative power, non-stationarity, zero crossing, entropy, and the matching of systolic wave detectors. Two independent annotators annotated all PPG data (106 recordings, 60 s each) and a third expert conducted the adjudication of differences. The independent annotators labeled each PPG signal with one of the following labels: excellent, acceptable or unfit for diagnosis. All indices were compared using Mahalanobis distance, linear discriminant analysis, quadratic discriminant analysis, and support vector machine with leave-one-out cross-validation. The skewness index outperformed the other seven indices in differentiating between excellent PPG and acceptable, acceptable combined with unfit, and unfit recordings, with overall F 1 scores of 86.0%, 87.2%, and 79.1%, respectively.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1