Publication | Open Access
Convolutional Neural Networks for Diabetic Retinopathy
905
Citations
15
References
2016
Year
Convolutional Neural NetworkEngineeringMachine LearningDiabetic RetinopathyImage ClassificationImage AnalysisRetinaData SciencePattern RecognitionColour FundusDigital Fundus ImagesRadiologyDermoscopic ImageMachine VisionOphthalmologyVisual DiagnosisMedical Image ComputingDeep LearningComputer VisionConvolutional Neural NetworksComputer-aided DiagnosisMedicine
Diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy from color fundus images is laborious and requires experienced clinicians to detect numerous small features within a complex grading system. This study proposes a convolutional neural network to diagnose diabetic retinopathy from digital fundus images and accurately classify its severity. The authors built a CNN with data augmentation that automatically detects microaneurysms, exudates, and hemorrhages, and trained it on a GPU using the publicly available Kaggle dataset. On 80,000 training images, the CNN achieved 95 % sensitivity and 75 % accuracy on a 5,000‑image validation set.
The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy (DR) through colour fundus images requires experienced clinicians to identify the presence and significance of many small features which, along with a complex grading system, makes this a difficult and time consuming task. In this paper, we propose a CNN approach to diagnosing DR from digital fundus images and accurately classifying its severity. We develop a network with CNN architecture and data augmentation which can identify the intricate features involved in the classification task such as micro-aneurysms, exudate and haemorrhages on the retina and consequently provide a diagnosis automatically and without user input. We train this network using a high-end graphics processor unit (GPU) on the publicly available Kaggle dataset and demonstrate impressive results, particularly for a high-level classification task. On the data set of 80,000 images used our proposed CNN achieves a sensitivity of 95% and an accuracy of 75% on 5,000 validation images.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1