BMJ · 2016 · 136 citations · 22 references
MedicinePerioperative MedicineSurgeryCardiothoracic SurgeryGeneral SurgeryPerioperative Outcomes ResearchCarotid Artery SurgeryPerioperative CarePostoperative MorbiditySurgical Resource UtilizationSurgical Valve ReplacementThoracic SurgeryHigh-risk Surgical PatientsLung Cancer ResectionOperative MorbidityPancreatic Cancer ResectionPostoperative MortalitySurgical Outcome Evaluation
OBJECTIVE: To measure the association between a surgeon's degree of specialization in a specific procedure and patient mortality. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of Medicare data. SETTING: US patients aged 66 or older enrolled in traditional fee for service Medicare. PARTICIPANTS: 25 152 US surgeons who performed one of eight procedures (carotid endarterectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, valve replacement, abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, lung resection, cystectomy, pancreatic resection, or esophagectomy) on 695 987 patients in 2008-13. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Relative risk reduction in risk adjusted and volume adjusted 30 day operative mortality between surgeons in the bottom quarter and top quarter of surgeon specialization (defined as the number of times the surgeon performed the specific procedure divided by his/her total operative volume across all procedures). RESULTS: For all four cardiovascular procedures and two out of four cancer resections, a surgeon's degree of specialization was a significant predictor of operative mortality independent of the number of times he or she performed that procedure: carotid endarterectomy (relative risk reduction between bottom and top quarter of surgeons 28%, 95% confidence interval 0% to 48%); coronary artery bypass grafting (15%, 4% to 25%); valve replacement (46%, 37% to 53%); abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (42%, 29% to 53%); lung resection (28%, 5% to 46%); and cystectomy (41%, 8% to 63%). In five procedures (carotid endarterectomy, valve replacement, lung resection, cystectomy, and esophagectomy), the relative risk reduction from surgeon specialization was greater than that from surgeon volume for that specific procedure. Furthermore, surgeon specialization accounted for 9% (coronary artery bypass grafting) to 100% (cystectomy) of the relative risk reduction otherwise attributable to volume in that specific procedure. CONCLUSION: For several common procedures, surgeon specialization was an important predictor of operative mortality independent of volume in that specific procedure. When selecting a surgeon, patients, referring physicians, and administrators assigning operative workload may want to consider a surgeon's procedure specific volume as well as the degree to which a surgeon specializes in that procedure.
22
Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United States
John D. Birkmeyer, Andrea E. Siewers, Emily Finlayson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2002 · 5K citations
Medicine, Surgery, General Surgery +15
Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United States
John D. Birkmeyer, Thérèse A. Stukel, Andrea E. Siewers et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2003 · 3.1K citations · Full text
Virtual Reality Training Improves Operating Room Performance
Neal E. Seymour, Anthony G. Gallagher, Sanziana A. Roman et al. · Annals of Surgery · 2002 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Medicine, Medical Education, Surgery +17
Surgical Skill and Complication Rates after Bariatric Surgery
John D. Birkmeyer, Jonathan F. Finks, Amanda O'Reilly et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2013 · 1.5K citations · Full text