PLoS ONE · 2016 · 17 citations · 33 references
Veterinary MedicineInfectious DiseasesMicrobiologyDiagnostic MicrobiologyMedical MicrobiologyMolecular DiagnosticsGastrointestinal Pathogen DiagnosticsInfectious Disease DetectionInfectious Disease Molecular TestingInfectious Disease ScreeningPathogen DetectionRapid Diagnostic TestsEnteric Bacterial Pathogen DetectionEnteric Pathogen DetectionGastrointestinal Pathogen TestingMicroarray-based DetectionMolecular Diagnosis Of Enteric PathogensMolecular Stool DiagnosticsMultiplex Microarray AssaysRapid Microbial Diagnostics
Infectious gastroenteritis is a global health problem associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. Rapid and accurate diagnosis is crucial to allow appropriate and timely treatment. Current laboratory stool testing has a long turnaround time (TAT) and demands highly qualified personnel and multiple techniques. The need for high throughput and the number of possible enteric pathogens compels the implementation of a molecular approach which uses multiplex technology, without compromising performance requirements. In this work we evaluated the feasibility of the NanoCHIP® Gastrointestinal Panel (GIP) (Savyon Diagnostics, Ashdod, IL), a molecular microarray-based screening test, to be used in the routine workflow of our laboratory, a big outpatient microbiology laboratory. The NanoCHIP® GIP test provides simultaneous detection of nine major enteric bacteria and parasites: Campylobacter spp., Salmonella spp., Shigella spp., Giardia sp., Cryptosporidium spp., Entamoeba histolytica, Entamoeba dispar, Dientamoeba fragilis, and Blastocystis spp. The required high-throughput was obtained by the NanoCHIP® detection system together with the MagNA Pure 96 DNA purification system (Roche Diagnostics Ltd., Switzerland). This combined system has demonstrated a higher sensitivity and detection yield compared to the conventional methods in both, retrospective and prospective samples. The identification of multiple parasites and bacteria in a single test also enabled increased efficiency of detecting mixed infections, as well as reduced hands-on time and work load. In conclusion, the combination of these two automated systems is a proper response to the laboratory needs in terms of improving laboratory workflow, turn-around-time, minimizing human errors and can be efficiently integrated in the routine work of the laboratory.
33
16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study
W G Weisburg, Susan M. Barns, Dale A. Pelletier et al. · Journal of Bacteriology · 1991 · 11.8K citations · Full text
Jaco J. Verweij, Roy A. Blangé, Kate Templeton et al. · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · 2004 · 418 citations · Full text