Journal of Experimental Psychology General · 2016 · 574 citations · 129 references
Social SciencesPsychologySocial PsychologyCulturePersonality PsychologySelfCross-cultural InvarianceCultural IdentityCross-cultural Measurement EquivalenceCross-cultural Personality AssessmentCross-cultural PsychologySelf-report MeasurementSelf-report Measures Of PersonalitySelf-report QuestionnairesSelf-report ScalesSelf-reported Data
Markus and Kitayama’s independent‑vs‑interdependent self‑construal theory shaped social and personality psychology, yet research has largely compared only North American and East Asian samples and found that common self‑report measures often fail to reveal the expected cultural differences. The authors aimed to revisit and refine the conceptualization and measurement of independent and interdependent self‑construals through two large multinational surveys employing improved cross‑cultural methods. They developed and validated a new seven‑dimensional model of self‑reported independent and interdependent ways of being in Study 1 (N = 2924 students across 16 nations) and Study 2 (N = 7279 adults from 55 cultural groups in 33 nations). The results show that while some predictions of Markus and Kitayama hold, a simple independence‑versus‑interdependence contrast does not capture the diverse self‑hood models across regions, as cultural groups emphasize different independent and interdependent facets depending on individualism‑collectivism, socioeconomic development, and religious heritage, and the new model will enable more precise future research.
Markus and Kitayama's (1991) theory of independent and interdependent self-construals had a major influence on social, personality, and developmental psychology by highlighting the role of culture in psychological processes. However, research has relied excessively on contrasts between North American and East Asian samples, and commonly used self-report measures of independence and interdependence frequently fail to show predicted cultural differences. We revisited the conceptualization and measurement of independent and interdependent self-construals in 2 large-scale multinational surveys, using improved methods for cross-cultural research. We developed (Study 1: N = 2924 students in 16 nations) and validated across cultures (Study 2: N = 7279 adults from 55 cultural groups in 33 nations) a new 7-dimensional model of self-reported ways of being independent or interdependent. Patterns of global variation support some of Markus and Kitayama's predictions, but a simple contrast between independence and interdependence does not adequately capture the diverse models of selfhood that prevail in different world regions. Cultural groups emphasize different ways of being both independent and interdependent, depending on individualism-collectivism, national socioeconomic development, and religious heritage. Our 7-dimensional model will allow future researchers to test more accurately the implications of cultural models of selfhood for psychological processes in diverse ecocultural contexts.
129
A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure
Sture Holm · Scandinavian Journal of Statistics · 1979 · 21.8K citations
Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind.
Harry C. Triandis, Geert Hofstede · Administrative Science Quarterly · 1993 · 17.9K citations · Full text