Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · 2016 · 25 citations · 21 references
Veterinary MedicineOrthopedic SurgeryRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyOrthopedicsComputed TomographyHip ArthroplastyImage Quality AssessmentImage ReconstructionMedical ImagingOrthopedic ImagingArtifact ReductionComputed Tomography ArtefactsFiltered Back ProjectionIterative ReconstructionMetal Artifact ReductionModel-based ReconstructionTomographic Image QualityTomography
OBJECTIVES: To quantify the combined use of iterative model-based reconstruction (IMR) and orthopaedic metal artefact reduction (O-MAR) in reducing metal artefacts and improving image quality in a total hip arthroplasty phantom. METHODS: Scans acquired at several dose levels and kVps were reconstructed with filtered back-projection (FBP), iterative reconstruction (iDose) and IMR, with and without O-MAR. Computed tomography (CT) numbers, noise levels, signal-to-noise-ratios and contrast-to-noise-ratios were analysed. RESULTS: Iterative model-based reconstruction results in overall improved image quality compared to iDose and FBP (P < 0.001). Orthopaedic metal artefact reduction is most effective in reducing severe metal artefacts improving CT number accuracy by 50%, 60%, and 63% (P < 0.05) and reducing noise by 1%, 62%, and 85% (P < 0.001) whereas improving signal-to-noise-ratios by 27%, 47%, and 46% (P < 0.001) and contrast-to-noise-ratios by 16%, 25%, and 19% (P < 0.001) with FBP, iDose, and IMR, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combined use of IMR and O-MAR strongly improves overall image quality and strongly reduces metal artefacts in the CT imaging of a total hip arthroplasty phantom.
21
CT artifacts: causes and reduction techniques
F. Edward Boas, Dominik Fleischmann · Imaging in Medicine · 2012 · 817 citations