The Botanical Review · 2015 · 462 citations · 218 references
Life SciencesBotanyEvolutionary BiologyPlant EvolutionPlant MorphologyPlant SystematicsDomestication GenomicsPlant DomesticationCannabis ClassificationCultivated Plant ClassificationHuman Plant SelectionSelectionWild Food Plants
Cannabis sativa has been cultivated for millennia as hemp fiber and marijuana, yet studies of its domesticated and wild forms have produced conflicting evolutionary interpretations and classifications, including proposals to split it into multiple species. The review investigates how human selection has altered Cannabis morphology, chemistry, distribution, and ecology over time, and proposes a classification framework to clarify the plant’s taxonomy. The authors analyze how disruptive selection for human‑desired traits distinguishes cultivated groups, assess the genetic mixing of wild and domesticated populations that obscures ancestral lineages, and evaluate conflicting classification approaches. The authors recommend treating Cannabis sativa as a single species comprising a narcotic subspecies and a non‑narcotic subspecies, each containing domesticated and ruderal varieties, and propose an alternative six‑group classification consistent with the international code of nomenclature for cultivated plants.
Cannabis sativa has been employed for thousands of years, primarily as a source of a stem fiber (both the plant and the fiber termed "hemp") and a resinous intoxicant (the plant and its drug preparations commonly termed "marijuana"). Studies of relationships among various groups of domesticated forms of the species and wild-growing plants have led to conflicting evolutionary interpretations and different classifications, including splitting C. sativa into several alleged species. This review examines the evolving ways Cannabis has been used from ancient times to the present, and how human selection has altered the morphology, chemistry, distribution and ecology of domesticated forms by comparison with related wild plants. Special attention is given to classification, since this has been extremely contentious, and is a key to understanding, exploiting and controlling the plant. Differences that have been used to recognize cultivated groups within Cannabis are the results of disruptive selection for characteristics selected by humans. Wild-growing plants, insofar as has been determined, are either escapes from domesticated forms or the results of thousands of years of widespread genetic exchange with domesticated plants, making it impossible to determine if unaltered primeval or ancestral populations still exist. The conflicting approaches to classifying and naming plants with such interacting domesticated and wild forms are examined. It is recommended that Cannabis sativa be recognized as a single species, within which there is a narcotic subspecies with both domesticated and ruderal varieties, and similarly a non-narcotic subspecies with both domesticated and ruderal varieties. An alternative approach consistent with the international code of nomenclature for cultivated plants is proposed, recognizing six groups: two composed of essentially non-narcotic fiber and oilseed cultivars as well as an additional group composed of their hybrids; and two composed of narcotic strains as well as an additional group composed of their hybrids.
218
Isolation and Structure of a Brain Constituent That Binds to the Cannabinoid Receptor
William A. Devane, Aviva Breuer, Roger G. Pertwee et al. · Science · 1992 · 5.6K citations
Henriette Méon · Geobios · 1990 · 3.5K citations
Canadian Journal of Plant Science · 1991 · 2.5K citations
Adaptation to Sun and Shade: a Whole-Plant Perspective
TJ Givnish · Australian Journal of Plant Physiology · 1988 · 1.8K citations · Full text
Evolution, consequences and future of plant and animal domestication
Jared M. Diamond · Nature · 2002 · 1.8K citations · Full text