Southern Journal of Applied Forestry · 2004 · 15 citations · 21 references
Natural ResourcesEnvironmental ManagementWatershed ManagementNutrient ManagementSilvicultureWatershed EcologyRiparian EcohydrologyRiparian EcologyRiparian Zone ResponsesStream EcologyVegetation ManagementLitter Carbon InputsMass Loss RatesRiparian Vegetation EffectsRiparian Vegetation ManagementStreamside Vegetation EffectsStreamside Vegetation ManagementUnderstory Vegetation CompositionVegetation Surveys
Abstract The purpose of this watershed study on three intermittent streams was to evaluate responses ofriparian processes to three streamside management zone (SMZ) treatments; no harvest, clearcut, and partial harvest(50% basal area removal). Riparian response variables measured included litterfall, leaf litter decomposition, understory vegetation, soil temperature and water chemistry. However, due to drought conditions, insufficient water chemistry data were collected to support quantitative assessment of treatment effects. Comparisons of mass loss rates (k) indicated that decomposition on the control treatment was the most rapid. Understory vegetation surveys showed statistically greater mass of forbs and grasses within the clearcut SMZ. Results suggest that no harvest or a partial harvest within SMZs along intermittent streams are preferable because these treatments maintain carbon inputs to streams. South. J. Appl. For. 28(4): 211–224.
21
Roger Rosentreter, Michael G. Barbour, Jack H. Burk et al. · Journal of Range Management · 1988 · 802 citations
Decomposition and Nutrient Exchange of Litter in an Alluvial Swamp Forest
Mark M. Brinson · Ecology · 1977 · 234 citations
Agriculture, Ecology, Soil Sciences +16