European Heart Journal · 2016 · 705 citations · 25 references
MedicineCardiologyRadiologyClinical CardiologyClinical Decision SupportMachine LearningCardiac Risk AssessmentCardiovascular ImagingCardiovascular RiskCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseRisk PredictionAutomated Feature LearningCoronary Artery Disease DetectionCoronary Ct AngiographyFramingham Risk ScoreLong-term Cardiovascular Risk PredictionMachine Learning For HealthcareModified Duke CriteriaNon-invasive Imaging Assessment
AIMS: Traditional prognostic risk assessment in patients undergoing non-invasive imaging is based upon a limited selection of clinical and imaging findings. Machine learning (ML) can consider a greater number and complexity of variables. Therefore, we investigated the feasibility and accuracy of ML to predict 5-year all-cause mortality (ACM) in patients undergoing coronary computed tomographic angiography (CCTA), and compared the performance to existing clinical or CCTA metrics. METHODS AND RESULTS: The analysis included 10 030 patients with suspected coronary artery disease and 5-year follow-up from the COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter registry. All patients underwent CCTA as their standard of care. Twenty-five clinical and 44 CCTA parameters were evaluated, including segment stenosis score (SSS), segment involvement score (SIS), modified Duke index (DI), number of segments with non-calcified, mixed or calcified plaques, age, sex, gender, standard cardiovascular risk factors, and Framingham risk score (FRS). Machine learning involved automated feature selection by information gain ranking, model building with a boosted ensemble algorithm, and 10-fold stratified cross-validation. Seven hundred and forty-five patients died during 5-year follow-up. Machine learning exhibited a higher area-under-curve compared with the FRS or CCTA severity scores alone (SSS, SIS, DI) for predicting all-cause mortality (ML: 0.79 vs. FRS: 0.61, SSS: 0.64, SIS: 0.64, DI: 0.62; P< 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Machine learning combining clinical and CCTA data was found to predict 5-year ACM significantly better than existing clinical or CCTA metrics alone.
25
Mark Hall, Eibe Frank, Geoffrey Holmes et al. · ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter · 2009 · 17.8K citations
Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease Using Risk Factor Categories
Peter W.F. Wilson, Ralph B. D’Agostino, Daniel Levy et al. · Circulation · 1998 · 9.6K citations
VERIFICATION OF FORECASTS EXPRESSED IN TERMS OF PROBABILITY
Glenn W. Brier · Monthly Weather Review · 1950 · 5.3K citations
Business, Mathematics, Meteorology +10