PubMed · 2015 · 19 citations · 34 references
EducationKinesiologyPhysiologyBone MetabolismExercise PhysiologyPhysical ActivityBone HealthMetabolic Responses To ExercisePhysical FitnessResistance TrainingStrength TrainingVibration ExposureAthlete Bone MetabolismBone Formation MarkersBone Resorption MarkersExercise Effects On Bone DensityExercise-induced Hematocrit ChangesResistance Exercise MetabolismTartrate-resistant Acid Phosphatase ActivityWhole-body Vibration
OBJECTIVE: We investigated acute bone turnover marker (BTM) responses to high-intensity resistance exercise with and without whole-body vibration (WBV) in young men (n=10). METHODS: In this randomized crossover study, subjects performed 2 protocols separated by 2-week wash out periods: 1) resistance exercise only (RE) (3 sets 10 repetitions 80% 1RM for 9 exercises); and 2) WBV + RE (side-alternating vibration platform 5 intermittent, 1-minute bouts 20 Hz, 3.38 mm peak-to-peak displacement followed by RE). Fasting morning blood draws were taken before RE or WBV (PRE), immediately post RE (IP), and 30 minutes post RE (30P). WBV + RE also had a blood draw after the WBV exposure (POST WBV). Blood samples were analyzed for lactate, hematocrit, bone-specific alkaline phosphatase (Bone ALP, U/L), C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX-I, ng/mL) and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase 5b (TRAP5b, U/L). RESULTS: Lactate, hematocrit, and Bone ALP significantly increased (p<0.05) IP for both protocols. Bone resorption markers did not change during RE only. CTX-I significantly decreased POST WBV. TRAP5b increased POST WBV, then significantly decreased at 30P. CONCLUSIONS: Generally, BTM changes to RE only were not significant when adjusted for hemoconcentration. The WBV stimulus altered bone resorption marker but not bone formation marker responses.
34
Per Qvist, Stephan Christgau, B.J. Pedersen et al. · Bone · 2002 · 345 citations
Nursing, Endocrinology, Physiology +16