Noise Annoyance Is Associated with Depression and Anxiety in the General Population- The Contribution of Aircraft Noise

Manfred E. Beutel, Claus Jünger, Eva M. Klein, Philipp S. Wild, Karl J. Lackner, Maria Blettner, Harald Binder, Matthias Michal, Jörg Wiltink, Elmar Brähler,

PLoS ONE · 2016 · 273 citations · 22 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Noise annoyance is an emerging environmental stressor, yet its link to mental health has been scarcely examined. The study aimed to assess the association between noise annoyance and anxiety/depression and to determine which environmental sources contribute most to overall annoyance, with future follow‑up planned to clarify causality. Using cross‑sectional data from 15,010 participants in the Gutenberg Health Study, researchers measured annoyance from road traffic, aircraft, railways, industrial, and neighborhood noise on 5‑point scales and assessed depression and anxiety with PHQ‑9 and GAD‑2. Overall noise annoyance was associated with a two‑fold increase in depression and anxiety prevalence, and aircraft noise was the predominant annoyance source (≈60 % of participants), although its direct link to mental health could not be established.

Abstract

Background While noise annoyance has become recognized as an important environmental stressor, its association to mental health has hardly been studied. We therefore determined the association of noise annoyance to anxiety and depression and explored the contribution of diverse environmental sources to overall noise annoyance. Patients and Methods We investigated cross-sectional data of n = 15.010 participants of the Gutenberg Health Study (GHS), a population-based, prospective, single-center cohort study in Mid-Germany (age 35 to 74 years). Noise annoyance was assessed separately for road traffic, aircraft, railways, industrial, neighborhood indoor and outdoor noise (“during the day”; “in your sleep”) on 5-point scales (“not at all” to “extremely”); depression and anxiety were assessed by the PHQ-9, resp. GAD-2. Results Depression and anxiety increased with the degree of overall noise annoyance. Compared to no annoyance, prevalence ratios for depression, respectively anxiety increased from moderate (PR depression 1.20; 95%CI 1.00 to 1.45; PR anxiety 1.42; 95% CI 1.15 to 1.74) to extreme annoyance (PR depression 1.97; 95%CI 1.62 to 2.39; PR anxiety 2.14; 95% CI 1.71 to 2.67). Compared to other sources, aircraft noise annoyance was prominent affecting almost 60% of the population. Interpretation Strong noise annoyance was associated with a two-fold higher prevalence of depression and anxiety in the general population. While we could not relate annoyance due to aircraft noise directly to depression and anxiety, we established that it was the major source of annoyance in the sample, exceeding the other sources in those strongly annoyed. Prospective follow-up data will address the issue of causal relationships between annoyance and mental health.

References

22