Challenging the techno-politics of anonymity: the case of cryptomarket users

Angus Bancroft, Peter Scott Reid

Information Communication & Society · 2016 · 65 citations · 46 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Anonymity is treated as a governance problem that can be addressed through technical solutions. The study uses the darknet to critically examine the governance‑centric view of anonymity, exploring its underlying assumptions and framing anonymity as a mode for engaging and maintaining social relationships. The authors analyze data from darknet cryptomarket users who primarily buy and sell illicit drugs, discuss drug quality, and share information on safe and effective use. The study finds that anonymous online interaction yields personal satisfaction, yet poses challenges to trust that are mitigated through a blend of technology and action, and contends that de‑anonymising norms and technologies stem from a flawed understanding of anonymity.

Abstract

Anonymity is treated as a problem of governance that can be subject to technical resolution. We use the example of the darknet to critically examine this approach. We explore the background assumptions that have been made about anonymity as a quality of social life. We conceive of anonymity as a way of engaging and maintaining social relationships in an anonymous mode. We draw on a study of darknet ‘cryptomarket’ users who mainly use the darknet to buy and sell illicit drugs, discuss drug quality and share information on safe and effective use. We identify the personal satisfaction that comes from interacting anonymously online, the challenges this represents for maintaining trusted interactions and how they are overcome, and the combination of technology and action involved in maintaining anonymity. We argue that attempts to promote de-anonymising norms and technology are based on an erroneous understanding of what anonymity is.

References

46