Quantitative swab culture versus tissue biopsy: a comparison in chronic wounds.

Abstract

Soft tissue infection present a significant obstacle to the healing of chronic wounds. Historically, the gold standard for determining wound bacterial bioburden has been the quantitative tissue biopsy. Nevertheless, tissue biopsies are not universally used in today's healthcare setting. Likely reasons include damage to healing tissue, the lack of facilities to process tissue biopsies, significant pain in sensate soft tissue, and increased expense with this modality. More recently, quantitative tissue swab culture has been suggested as a means to determine the wound bioburden. The authors prospectively studied 38 patients with chronic wounds of various etiologies to evaluate the correlation between quantitative wound biopsy and swab culture. Of the 38 biopsies performed, 74% indicated infection. Simultaneous swab culture of these 28 biopsies indicated infection in 22 of the 28 cases for a correlation of 79%. The authors concluded that quantitative swab culture provides a valuable adjunct in the management of chronic wounds.