Concepedia

TLDR

The largest cities in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland have cut car trip shares by over 25 years despite high motorisation, with each city employing a somewhat different mix of policies. Their success stems from a coordinated package of transport and land‑use policies that slow, cost, and inconvenience car use while boosting walking, cycling, and public transport, and promoting compact mixed‑use development. German cities emphasized cycling, Zurich and Vienna prioritized low‑fare public transport, parking management proved most effective, and the five cases show that affluent societies can curb car dependence while maintaining high travel quality.

Abstract

Munich, Berlin, Hamburg, Vienna, and Zurich – the largest cities in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland – have significantly reduced the car share of trips over the past 25 years in spite of high motorisation rates. The key to their success has been a coordinated package of mutually reinforcing transport and land-use policies that have made car use slower, less convenient, and more costly, while increasing the safety, convenience, and feasibility of walking, cycling, and public transport. The mix of policies implemented in each city has been somewhat different. The German cities have done far more to promote cycling, while Zurich and Vienna offer more public transport service per capita at lower fares. All five of the cities have implemented roughly the same policies to promote walking, foster compact mixed-use development, and discourage car use. Of the car-restrictive policies, parking management has been by far the most important. The five case study cities demonstrate that it is possible to reduce car dependence even in affluent societies with high levels of car ownership and high expectations for quality of travel.

References

YearCitations

Page 1