Chinese Journal of Cancer · 2016 · 147 citations · 28 references
MedicineOncologyPathologyCancer EpidemiologySurgical OncologyTumor PathologyCancer DiagnosisCancer Survival AnalysisMalignant NeoplasmsNasopharyngeal CancerTumor ClassificationTumor HistopathologyHistologic Tumor ClassificationHistopathologic ExaminationHistopathologic InterpretationHistopathologic ValidationHistopathological Tumor ClassificationPrognostic ClassificationSquamous Cell Carcinoma HistologyTreatment Response Classification
BACKGROUND: The current World Health Organization (WHO) classification of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) conveys little prognostic information. This study aimed to propose an NPC histopathologic classification that can potentially be used to predict prognosis and treatment response. METHODS: We initially developed a histopathologic classification based on the morphologic traits and cell differentiation of tumors of 2716 NPC patients who were identified at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC) (training cohort). Then, the proposed classification was applied to 1702 patients (retrospective validation cohort) from hospitals outside SYSUCC and 1613 patients (prospective validation cohort) from SYSUCC. The efficacy of radiochemotherapy and radiotherapy modalities was compared between the proposed subtypes. We used Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) for overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The 5-year OS rates for all NPC patients who were diagnosed with epithelial carcinoma (EC; 3708 patients), mixed sarcomatoid-epithelial carcinoma (MSEC; 1247 patients), sarcomatoid carcinoma (SC; 823 patients), and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC; 253 patients) were 79.4%, 70.5%, 59.6%, and 42.6%, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate models, patients with MSEC had a shorter OS than patients with EC (HR = 1.44, 95% CI = 1.27-1.62), SC (HR = 2.00, 95% CI = 1.76-2.28), or SCC (HR = 4.23, 95% CI = 3.34-5.38). Radiochemotherapy significantly improved survival compared with radiotherapy alone for patients with EC (HR = 0.67, 95% CI = 0.56-0.80), MSEC (HR = 0.58, 95% CI = 0.49-0.75), and possibly for those with SCC (HR = 0.63; 95% CI = 0.40-0.98), but not for patients with SC (HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.74-1.28). CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification offers more information for the prediction of NPC prognosis compared with the WHO classification and might be a valuable tool to guide treatment decisions for subtypes that are associated with a poor prognosis.
28
Joseph Wee, Eng Huat Tan, Bee Choo Tai et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2005 · 652 citations · Full text
Lei Chen, Chaosu Hu, Xiao-Zhong Chen et al. · The Lancet Oncology · 2011 · 564 citations
Edwin P. Hui, Sing Fai Leung, Ann D. King et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2008 · 525 citations · Full text
Anthony T.�C. Chan, S. F. Leung, Roger KC Ngan et al. · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2005 · 521 citations
Anne W.M. Lee, W.H. Lau, Stewart Y. Tung et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2005 · 448 citations