Concepedia

Publication | Closed Access

Overall Survival After Concurrent Cisplatin-Radiotherapy Compared With Radiotherapy Alone in Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

516

Citations

15

References

2005

Year

TLDR

This phase III randomized study compared concurrent cisplatin–radiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A total of 350 patients were randomized to receive external beam radiotherapy alone or with weekly cisplatin 40 mg/m², and overall survival was the primary endpoint with a median follow‑up of 5.5 years. The 5‑year overall survival was 58.6 % for RT alone versus 70.3 % for CRT, with a statistically significant survival advantage for CRT (HR 0.71, P = 0.049); the benefit was pronounced in T3/T4 disease (HR 0.51, P = 0.013) but not in T1/T2.

Abstract

This phase III randomized study compared concurrent cisplatin–radiotherapy (CRT) versus radiotherapy (RT) alone in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. A total of 350 patients were randomly assigned to receive external RT alone or concurrently with cisplatin at a dosage of 40 mg/m 2 weekly. The primary endpoint was overall survival, and the median follow-up was 5.5 years. The 5-year overall survival was 58.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 50.9% to 66.2%) for the RT arm and 70.3% (95% CI = 63.4% to 77.3%) for the CRT arm. In Cox regression analysis adjusted for T stage, age, and overall stage, the difference in overall survival was statistically significantly in favor of concurrent CRT ( P = .049, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.71 [95% CI = 0.5 to 1.0]). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that there was no difference between overall survival in the arms for T1/T2 stage ( P = .74, HR = 0.93 [95% CI = 0.59 to 1.4]), whereas there was a difference between the arms for T3/T4 stage ( P = .013, HR = 0.51 [95% CI = 0.3 to 0.88]), favoring the CRT arm. The regimen of weekly concurrent CRT is a promising standard treatment strategy for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.

References

YearCitations

Page 1