The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process · 1999 · 17 citations · 0 references
Open access
Civil LitigationArgumentation AnalysisConstitutional LawAppellate BriefLawSupreme Court AdvocacyAdministrative LawRhetoricOral ArgumentsCivil Rights ActionsLegal ProcessLegal Information RetrievalLanguage StudiesCase LawLegal WritingUnited States ConstitutionPublic Interest LawArgumentation FrameworkConstitutional LitigationLegal HistoryDaniel WebsterFederal Constitutional LawJusticeLinguisticsPublic Debate
Chief Justice William Rehnquist analyzed the evolution of Supreme Court advocacy. The discussion begins with the initial preference for oral arguments and the influence of nineteenth century Supreme Court advocate Daniel Webster. The discussion then turns to the Court’s shift from more attention to oral argument to written briefs.