Oral Argument Practice

Oral Argument Practice is a formal procedural framework within patent appeals that constitutes the structured presentation of legal reasoning and evidence by parties before an appellate board, distinguishing itself from other procedural mechanisms through its reliance on real-time verbal advocacy to influence adjudicative outcomes.

22

Publications

723

Citations

27

Authors

22

Institutions

Publications per year

2017–2026

3

Authors

27

  1. TR
    Timothy R. Johnson

    University of Minnesota, United States

    7 publications · 226 citations

    7

    h-index

  2. RC
    Ryan C. Black

    Michigan State University, United States

    3 publications · 91 citations

    3

    h-index

  3. JW
    Justin Wedeking

    University of Kentucky, United States

    2 publications · 46 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. RJ
    Ryan J. Owens

    University of Wisconsin–Madison, United States

    2 publications · 45 citations

    2

    h-index

  5. PJ
    Paul J. Wahlbeck

    George Washington University, United States

    2 publications · 58 citations

    2

    h-index

1–5 of 27

Venues

  1. The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process

    3 publications · 95 citations

    3

    h-index

  2. Journal of Supreme Court History

    2 publications · 106 citations

    2

    h-index

  3. Choice Reviews Online

    CRO · 2 publications · 85 citations

    2

    h-index

  4. Politics and the Life Sciences

    PLS · 1 publications · 25 citations

    1

    h-index

  5. Discourse Studies

    1 publications · 23 citations

    1

    h-index

1–5