Oral Argument Practice
Oral Argument Practice is a formal procedural framework within patent appeals that constitutes the structured presentation of legal reasoning and evidence by parties before an appellate board, distinguishing itself from other procedural mechanisms through its reliance on real-time verbal advocacy to influence adjudicative outcomes.
22
Publications
723
Citations
27
Authors
22
Institutions
Publications per year
2017–2026
3
Parents
22
Timothy R. Johnson, Ryan C. Black, Jerry Goldman et al. · Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) · 2009 · 45 citations · Full text
1–5 of 22
27
7
h-index
3
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
2
h-index
1–5 of 27
22

University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, United States
4 h-index
5 publications
174 citations
Twin Cities Orthopedics
Edina, United States
3 h-index
3 publications
84 citations
George Washington University
Washington, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
58 citations
University of Wisconsin–Madison
Madison, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
45 citations
Michigan State University
East Lansing, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
75 citations
University of Minnesota System
Minneapolis, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
68 citations

Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, United States
2 h-index
2 publications
58 citations

Sun Yat-sen University
Guangzhou, China
1 h-index
2 publications
24 citations
1–8 of 22
3 publications · 95 citations
3
h-index
2 publications · 106 citations
2
h-index
CRO · 2 publications · 85 citations
2
h-index
PLS · 1 publications · 25 citations
1
h-index
1 publications · 23 citations
1
h-index
1–5