Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging · 2016 · 171 citations · 37 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic RadiologyNeuro-oncologyBrain TumorsMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical ImagingNeuro-oncology ImagingTumor CharacterizationTumor ImagingDiagnostic Performance MetricsImaging Response EvaluationInstitutional Review Board ApprovalLongitudinal Imaging Follow-upMagnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-upRadiographic ProgressionSerial Imaging AnalysisTumor Progression Monitoring
PURPOSE: To assess amide proton transfer-weighted (APTW) imaging features in patients with malignant gliomas after chemoradiation and the diagnostic performance of APT imaging for distinguishing true progression from pseudoprogression. MATERIALS AND METHODS: After approval by the Institutional Review Board, 32 patients with clinically suspected tumor progression in the first 3 months after chemoradiation were enrolled and scanned at 3T. Longitudinal routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) changes and medical records were assessed to confirm true progression versus pseudoprogression. True progression was defined as lesions progressing on serial imaging over 6 months, and pseudoprogression was defined as lesions stabilizing or regressing without intervention. The APTWmean and APTWmax signals were obtained from three to five regions of interests for each patient and compared between the true progression and pseudoprogression groups. The diagnostic performance was assessed with receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. RESULTS: The true progression was associated with APTW hyperintensity (APTWmean = 2.75% ± 0.42%), while pseudoprogression was associated with APTW isointensity to mild hyperintensity (APTWmean = 1.56% ± 0.42%). The APTW signal intensities were significantly higher in the true progression group (n = 20) than in the pseudoprogression group (P < 0.001; n = 12). The cutoff APTWmean and APTWmax intensity values to distinguish between true progression and pseudoprogression were 2.42% (with a sensitivity of 85.0% and a specificity of 100%) and 2.54% (with a sensitivity of 95.0% and a specificity of 91.7%), respectively. CONCLUSION: The APTW-MRI signal is a valuable imaging biomarker for distinguishing pseudoprogression from true progression in glioma patients. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2016;44:456-462.
37
Radiotherapy plus Concomitant and Adjuvant Temozolomide for Glioblastoma
Roger Stupp, Warren Mason, Martin J. van den Bent et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 2005 · 21.6K citations · Full text
Amide proton transfer (APT) contrast for imaging of brain tumors
Jinyuan Zhou, Bachchu Lal, David A. Wilson et al. · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2003 · 659 citations