Proteins Structure Function and Bioinformatics · 2016 · 16 citations · 53 references
Protein–protein InteractionsEngineeringProtein AssemblyMolecular BiologyMolecular DynamicsMolecular InteractionsProtein FoldingProtein ComplexesMolecular SimulationComputational BiochemistryBiophysicsProtein ChemistryDissociation RateBiochemistryBiochemical InteractionProtein ModelingBiomolecular InteractionFree Energy ProfilesMolecular ModelingNatural SciencesMolecular BiophysicsComputational Biophysics
To clarify the interplay between the binding affinity and kinetics of protein-protein interactions, and the possible role of intrinsically disordered proteins in such interactions, molecular simulations were carried out on 20 protein complexes. With bias potential and reweighting techniques, the free energy profiles were obtained under physiological affinities, which showed that the bound-state valley is deep with a barrier height of 12 - 33 RT. From the dependence of the affinity on interface interactions, the entropic contribution to the binding affinity is approximated to be proportional to the interface area. The extracted dissociation rates based on the Arrhenius law correlate reasonably well with the experimental values (Pearson correlation coefficient R = 0.79). For each protein complex, a linear free energy relationship between binding affinity and the dissociation rate was confirmed, but the distribution of the slopes for intrinsically disordered proteins showed no essential difference with that observed for ordered proteins. A comparison with protein folding was also performed. Proteins 2016; 84:920-933. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
53
Towards a proteome-scale map of the human protein–protein interaction network
Jean‐François Rual, K. Venkatesan, Tong Hao et al. · Nature · 2005 · 3K citations
Zsuzsanna Dosztányi, Veronika Csizmók, Péter Tompa et al. · Journal of Molecular Biology · 2005 · 1K citations
Protein Chemistry, Intrinsically Unstructured Proteins, Biochemistry +10