Implant Dentistry · 2015 · 30 citations · 37 references
DentistryImplant DentistryPeriodonticsBone AugmentationDentoalveolar SurgeryImplant SurgeryAlveolar BoneAlveolar Bone AnatomyAlveolar Bone BiologyAlveolar Bone ResorptionAlveolar Ridge AssessmentAlveolar Bone ContourAlveolar Bone MorphologyAlveolar Bone ThicknessAlveolar Ridge MorphologyAlveolar Ridge WidthCrestal Bone ResorptionSoft Tissue Contour AnalysisSurgical Implant Placement
INTRODUCTION: The buccal bone resorption and the deformation of soft tissue contour are major problems of immediate implant treatment. This study aims to examine the changes of alveolar bone and soft tissue after immediate implant placement in different buccal gap distances. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eight implants were placed randomly in the mandibular premolar sockets of 6 hybrid dogs with 1, 2, and 3 mm buccal gap distances. The dogs were killed after 2 or 4 months for morphometric and microcomputed tomography analyses. DISCUSSION: After 2 months, the 3-mm group had the highest buccal bone volume (BV), buccal bone/soft tissue thickness, and the lowest bone resorption. The wider the buccal gap, the more buccal bone and soft tissue were formed in this experimental setting. After 4 months, the buccal BV had decreased significantly in the 1-mm and the 2-mm groups, whereas the 3-mm group resisted to buccal bone resorption. This difference was more pronounced at the crest. CONCLUSION: The 3 mm is the optimal gap distance among the groups examined, which drastically influences the healing of bone and soft tissue surrounding the implants.
37
Lars Schropp, Ann Wenzel, Lambros Kostopoulos et al. · Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry · 2004 · 1.8K citations · Full text