Hard‐tissue alterations following immediate implant placement in extraction sites

TLDR

Marginal gaps can form after immediate implant placement in extraction sockets, and these gaps may be filled by new bone during healing. The study aimed to evaluate dimensional changes of hard tissues following tooth extraction and immediate implant placement. Eighteen patients (21 teeth) underwent immediate implant placement without membranes or fillers, with flap elevation, implant installation, and clinical measurements of bone walls and marginal defects, followed by suturing and exposure of the healing cap. After four months, most marginal defects resolved—only eight remained >3 mm—while significant bone resorption occurred (56 % buccal horizontal, 30 % lingual/palatal), and new bone formed from within the defects, leading to overall gap closure.

Abstract

The marginal gap that may occur following implant installation in an extraction socket may be resolved by hard-tissue fill during healing.To study dimensional alterations of hard tissues that occur following tooth extraction and immediate placement of implants.Eighteen subjects with a total of 21 teeth scheduled for extraction were included. Following flap elevation and the removal of a tooth and implant installation, clinical measurements were made to characterize the dimension of the surrounding bone walls, as well as the marginal defect. No membranes or filler material was used. The flaps were subsequently replaced and secured with sutures in such a way that the healing cap of the implant was exposed to the oral environment. After 4 months of healing a re-entry procedure was performed and the clinical measurements were repeated.Fifty-two marginal defects exceeding 3 mm were present at baseline: 21 at buccal, 17 at lingual/palatal, and 14 at approximal surfaces. At the re-entry eight defects exceeding 3.0 mm remained. During the 4 months of healing, the bone walls of the extraction underwent marked change. The horizontal resorption of the buccal bone dimension amounted to about 56%. The corresponding resorption of the lingual/palatal bone was 30%. The vertical bone crest resorption amounted to 0.3+/-0.6 mm (buccal), 0.6+/-1.0 mm (lingual/palatal), 0.2+/-0.7 mm (mesial), and 0.5+/-0.9 mm (distal).The marginal gap that occurred between the metal rod and the bone tissue following implant installation in an extraction socket may predictably heal with new bone formation and defect resolution. The current results further documented that marginal gaps in buccal and palatal/lingual locations were resolved through new bone formation from the inside of the defects and substantial bone resorption from the outside of the ridge.