American Journal of International Law · 1990 · 87 citations · 0 references
LawInternational LawJurisprudenceInternational Dispute SettlementPhilosophy Of LawPublic International LawArbitral JurisdictionBoundary DisputesMaritime BordersMaritime DelimitationTerritorial DisputesTerritorial JurisdictionArbitral DelimitationDelimitation Between Adjacent StatesDelimitation Equidistance PrincipleDistance CriterionMaritime Boundary EquitabilityNatural ProlongationProper FunctionSpecialized Tribunals
The recent decisions of the International Court of Justice and various arbitral tribunals with respect to the delimitation of maritime boundaries between states raise certain fundamental problems of jurisprudence. Among these are the legal consequences emanating from the proposition that each boundary is a unicum , that is to say, it is unique or monotypic; the part to be played by equity in the delimitation process; the role of equidistance; the legal consequences of the demise of natural prolongation and the emergence of the distance criterion or principle; the notion of a properly structured system of equity; and the proper function of the Court or tribunal in dealing with these matters.