International Journal of Surgery Open · 2016 · 24 citations · 12 references
MedicineHealth LawSurgeryGeneral SurgeryPerioperative DocumentationPerioperative Quality ImprovementAppendiceal SurgeryIntraoperative DocumentationLaparoscopic SurgeryMinimally Invasive SurgeryOperative Note DocumentationProcedure DocumentationChecklist Compliance In SurgeryLaparoscopic AppendectomyMedico-legal DocumentationProcedure Note DocumentationRetrospective Coding AuditSurgical AuditSurgical Procedure DescriptionSurgical Procedure Documentation
ABSTRACT Introduction: Operation notes provide an insight into the operative process and stand as a legal document of a surgical procedure occurring. Maintaining accurate, complete and legible notes is fundamental for post-operative patient care and medico-legal purposes. This study aimed at comparing the quality of laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes prior-to and after the introduction of a procedure-specific proforma consistent with the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) guidelines, 2014. Methods: Nineteen parameters based on the RCSEng ‘Good Surgical Practice’ 2014 guidelines were used to audit laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes. The study consisted of a retrospective audit of 43 consecutive laparoscopic appendicectomy operation notes and a prospective audit of 57 consecutive operation notes following the introduction of a procedure-specific proforma (existing in both hard copy and electronic versions) for laparoscopic appendicectomy. We assessed: (i) the overall compliance with the RCSEng guidelines, (ii) whether each parameter of RCSEng guidelines recommendations were clearly recorded in the operation notes, and (iii) legibility of operation notes. Statistical analysis for difference between the two groups was performed using the independent sample t-test. Results: After introduction of a procedure-specific profroma for laparoscopic appendicectomy, average compliance with RCSEng guidelines increased from 66% retrospectively to 94% prospectively (p < 0.00001). In 8 of the 19 parameters assessed there was significant improvement in adherence to guidelines. Discussion: The implementation of a procedure-specific operation significantly increased compliance with RCSEng guidelines. Such proformas may help reduce variability and standardise operation notes for the same procedure and improve post-operative care. Highlights:
12
Greg Ogrinc, Louise Davies, Daisy Goodman et al. · BMJ Quality & Safety · 2015 · 2.8K citations · Full text
Health Professions, Health Services Administration, Quality Management +17
AN AUDIT OF OPERATIVE NOTES: FACTS AND WAYS TO IMPROVE*
Liviu P. Lefter, Stuart Walker, Fleur Dewhurst et al. · ANZ Journal of Surgery · 2008 · 81 citations
The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
Kathryn Rigby, Steven R. Brown, Gregory E. Lakin et al. · PubMed · 1999 · 59 citations
An audit of the quality of operation notes in an otolaryngology unit.
A. Simon Carney, K. P. Gibbin · PubMed · 1999 · 56 citations
Medicine, Otolaryngology, Surgery +13