Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2000 · 80 citations · 24 references
MedicineOncologyRadiation OncologyCancer PreventionClinical Radiation OncologyGastrointestinal OncologyAntidiarrheal TherapyBowel Function AssessmentDiarrhea ManagementPelvic Radiation CareRadiation TherapyAntidiarrheal AgentsBowel Function ManagementPatient-reported Bowel SymptomsRadiation Effects On The Gastrointestinal TractRadiation-induced DiarrheaRadiation-induced Gastrointestinal ToxicitySevere Fecal IncontinenceSucralfate Therapy
PURPOSE: Randomized studies have suggested that sucralfate is effective in mitigating diarrhea during pelvic radiation therapy (RT). This North Central Cancer Treatment Group study was undertaken to confirm the antidiarrheal effect of sucralfate. Several other measures of bowel function were also assessed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients receiving pelvic RT to a minimum of 45 Gy at 1.7 to 2.1 Gy/d were eligible for the study. Patients were assigned randomly, in double-blind fashion, to receive sucralfate (1.5 g orally every 6 hours) or an identical looking placebo during pelvic RT. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-three patients were randomly assigned and found assessable. Overall, there was no significant difference in patient characteristics between those receiving sucralfate and those receiving placebo. Moderate or worse diarrhea was observed in 53% of patients receiving sucralfate versus 41% of those receiving placebo. Compared with patients receiving placebo, more sucralfate-treated patients reported fecal incontinence (16% v 34%, respectively; P =. 04) and need for protective clothing (8% v 23%, respectively; P =. 04). The incidence and severity of nausea were worse among those taking sucralfate (P =.03). Analysis of patient-reported symptoms 10 to 12 months after RT showed a nonsignificant trend toward more problems in patients taking sucralfate than in those taking placebo (average, 2.3 v 1.9 problems, respectively; P =.34). CONCLUSION: Sucralfate did not decrease pelvic RT-related bowel toxicity by any of the end points measured and seems to have aggravated some gastrointestinal symptoms.
24
Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores.
David Osoba, George Rodrigues, James D. Myles et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 1998 · 2.9K citations
Effective Surgical Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Rectal Carcinoma
James E. Krook, C G Moertel, Leonard L. Gunderson et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1991 · 1.9K citations
Michael J. O’Connell, James A. Martenson, Harry S. Wieand et al. · New England Journal of Medicine · 1994 · 1.1K citations · Full text