Publication | Closed Access
Critical Reasons for Crashes Investigated in the National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey
806
Citations
0
References
2015
Year
Unknown Venue
EngineeringCrash Causal ChainSafety ScienceInjury PreventionTraffic MedicineTraffic InjuryCausal InferenceCrashes InvestigatedCrash OccurrenceDriver BehaviorAccident InvestigationRisk ManagementTransport AccidentPublic HealthStatisticsRoad SafetyTraffic SafetyCritical ReasonRoad Traffic SafetyEpidemiologyCritical ReasonsSafety AnalysisCrisis Management
The NMVCCS collected on‑scene data on events and factors leading to light‑vehicle crashes between 2005 and 2007. The survey examined pre‑crash movement, critical events, critical reasons, and associated factors across a weighted sample of 5,470 crashes representing roughly 2.19 million national crashes. An estimated 4.03 million vehicles, 3.95 million drivers, and 1.98 million passengers were involved, with drivers assigned the critical reason in 94 % of crashes; vehicle‑component failures and environmental factors accounted for 2 % each, and among 2.05 million drivers with critical reasons, recognition, decision, and performance errors comprised 41 %, 33 %, and 11 % respectively.
The National Motor Vehicle Crash Causation Survey (NMVCCS), conducted from 2005 to 2007, was aimed at collecting on-scene information about the events and associated factors leading up to crashes involving light vehicles. Several facets of crash occurrence were investigated during data collection, namely the pre-crash movement, critical pre-crash event, critical reason, and the associated factors. A weighted sample of 5,470 crashes was investigated over a period of two and a half years, which represents an estimated 2,189,000 crashes nationwide. About 4,031,000 vehicles, 3,945,000 drivers, and 1,982,000 passengers were estimated to have been involved in these crashes. The critical reason, which is the last event in the crash causal chain, was assigned to the driver in 94 percent (±2.2%)† of the crashes. In about 2 percent (±0.7%) of the crashes, the critical reason was assigned to a vehicle component’s failure or degradation, and in 2 percent (±1.3%) of crashes, it was attributed to the environment (slick roads, weather, etc.). Among an estimated 2,046,000 drivers who were assigned critical reasons, recognition errors accounted for about 41 percent (±2.1%), decision errors 33 percent (±3.7%), and performance errors 11 percent (±2.7%) of the crashes.