PubMed · 2015 · 15 citations · 21 references
MedicineNutritional SciencesOncologyCancer EpidemiologyEpidemiologyMeta-analysisCancer RiskDiet EpidemiologyDiet-disease AssociationsDose-response Meta-analysisThyroid CancerCase-control Association StudiesDietary Cancer PreventionDietary EpidemiologyPublication Bias DetectionRelative Risk EstimationTea Consumption BehaviorThyroid Cancer Risk
OBJECTIVES: Epidemiological studies evaluating the association of tea consumption and the risk of thyroid cancer risk have produced inconsistent results. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to assess the relationship between tea consumption and thyroid cancer risk. METHODS: Pertinent studies were identified by a search in PubMed and Web of Knowledge. The random effect model was used based to combine the results. Publication bias was estimated using Egger's regression asymmetry test. RESULTS: Finally, 11 articles with 14 studies (2 cohort studies and 12 case-control studies) involving 2,955 thyroid cancer cases and 106,447 participants were included in this meta-analysis. The relative risk (95% confidence interval) of thyroid cancer for the highest versus the lowest category of tea consumption was 0.774 (95% CI = 0.619-0.967), and the associations were also significant in Europe and America, but not in the Asia. No publication bias was found. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis indicated that higher tea consumption may have a protective effect on thyroid cancer, especially in Europe and America.
21
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
David Moher, A. Liberati, Jennifer Tetzlaff et al. · BMJ · 2009 · 83.3K citations · Full text
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Matthias Egger, George Davey Smith, Martin Schneider et al. · BMJ · 1997 · 56.3K citations
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
Rebecca DerSimonian, Nan M. Laird · Controlled Clinical Trials · 1986 · 39.3K citations