Risk Matrix for Delay Causes in Construction Projects in Saudi Arabia

Ibrahim Mahamid, Abdulaziz Ibraheem Al-Ghonamy, Mohamed Aichouni

Research Journal of Applied Sciences Engineering and Technology · 2015 · 31 citations · 13 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

Construction projects in Saudi Arabia face significant time‑performance challenges, with delays often leading to disputes and many variables influencing project schedules. This study seeks to develop a risk matrix of delay causes from the perspective of consultants in Saudi Arabia. A survey of 51 consultants in the Northern Province, combined with a literature review that identified 35 potential delay causes, formed the basis of the analysis. The most critical delay causes identified were bid award for lowest price, material type/specification changes, contract management issues, contract duration, material price fluctuations, frequent design changes, improper planning, inflation, manpower shortages, long design‑to‑implementation lag, payment delays, poor labor productivity, and rework.

Abstract

Time performance of a project is usually a particularly important consideration for the construction parties. Often, the most troublesome construction disputes involve delay and failure to complete the work in the specified time frame. Many variables have an impact upon construction delay in Saudi Arabia. This study aims at identifying the risk matrix for delay causes in construction projects in Saudi Arabia from consultants' viewpoint. A questionnaire survey was undertaken of 51 consultants working on construction projects in the Northern Province of Saudi Arabia. Thirty five delay causes were identified through literature review. The study concluded that the top delay causes in construction projects in Saudi Arabia from consultants' perspective are: bid award for lowest price, changes in material types and specifications during construction, contract management, duration of contract period, fluctuation of prices of materials, frequent changes in design, improper planning, inflationary pressure, lack of adequate manpower, long period between design and time of implementation, payments delay, poor labor productivity and rework.

References

13