2009 · 116 citations · 24 references
ComputingComputer ScienceData ScienceData MiningMachine LearningPredictive AnalyticsClassificationRelevance RankingBinary RelevanceEmpirical EvaluationLabel RankingLinear ComplexityPredictive PerformancePruningRelevance ModelsStacking
Abstract. Binary relevance (BR) learns a single binary model for each different label of multi-label data. It has linear complexity with respect to the number of labels, but does not take into account label correlations and may fail to accurately predict label combinations and rank labels according to relevance with a new in-stance. Stacking the models of BR in order to learn a model that associates their output to the true value of each label is a way to alleviate this problem. In this paper we propose the pruning of the models participating in the stacking process, by explicitly measuring the degree of label correlation using the phi coefficient. Exploratory analysis of phi shows that the correlations detected are meaningful and useful. Empirical evaluation of the pruning approach shows that it leads to substantial reduction of the computational cost of stacking and occasional im-provements in predictive performance. 1
24
David H. Wolpert · Neural Networks · 1992 · 7.5K citations
ML-KNN: A lazy learning approach to multi-label learning
Min-Ling Zhang, Zhi‐Hua Zhou · Pattern Recognition · 2007 · 3.5K citations
RCV1: A New Benchmark Collection for Text Categorization Research
David Lewis, Yiming Yang, Tony Rose et al. · Goldsmiths (University of London) · 2004 · 2.6K citations · Full text
Grigorios Tsoumakas, Ioannis Katakis · International Journal of Data Warehousing and Mining · 2007 · 2.5K citations
Learning multi-label scene classification
Matthew Boutell, Jiebo Luo, Xipeng Shen et al. · Pattern Recognition · 2004 · 2.3K citations