Defining Peer-to-Peer Accountability From the Nurse’s Perspective

Jacqueline Jansen Lockett, Leslie Barkley, Jaynelle F. Stichler, Jeanne Palomo, Bozena Kik, Christopher Walker, Janet Donnelly, Judy Willon, Julie Sanborn, Noeleen O’Byrne

JONA The Journal of Nursing Administration · 2015 · 23 citations · 6 references

Concepts

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to define and create a conceptual model for peer-to-peer accountability (P to PA). BACKGROUND: Many organizations cite the importance of peer accountability (PA) as essential in ensuring patient safety. Professionalism in nursing requires self-regulation of practice and PA. Although discussed in the literature, P to PA is not conceptually defined. METHODS: A grounded theory study design with constant comparative data collection and analysis was used to explore nurses' definitions of P to PA and their perceptions of motivators and barriers to engaging in P to PA. Transcripts of digital recordings of all interviews were analyzed using line-by-line coding until identified themes emerged. RESULTS: P to PA was defined as the act of speaking up when one observes a peer not practicing to acceptable standards. A conceptual model illustrates the antecedents, attributes, and consequences of P to PA. CONCLUSIONS: P to PA is the professional responsibility of every nurse and healthcare provider and is essential for safe patient care. The conceptual definition facilitates actualization of P to PA in practice.

References

6