Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2013 · 22 citations · 15 references
ComputingBiomedical InformaticsHealth InformaticsBiomedical Text MiningClinical InformaticsNatural Language ProcessingClassificationClinical Natural Language ProcessingInformation ExtractionKeyword ExtractionNatural Language Processing For PhenotypingSupport Vector MachinesAccuracyClinical Text AnnotationCross-validationK-fold Cross-validationK-fold ValidationPatient NarrativesSupport Vector ClassificationSupport Vector Machine Classification
This study aimed to reduce reliance on large training datasets in support vector machine (SVM)-based clinical text analysis by categorizing keyword features. An enhanced Mayo smoking status detection pipeline was deployed. We used a corpus of 709 annotated patient narratives. The pipeline was optimized for local data entry practice and lexicon. SVM classifier retraining used a grouped keyword approach for better efficiency. Accuracy, precision, and F-measure of the unaltered and optimized pipelines were evaluated using k-fold cross-validation. Initial accuracy of the clinical Text Analysis and Knowledge Extraction System (cTAKES) package was 0.69. Localization and keyword grouping improved system accuracy to 0.9 and 0.92, respectively. F-measures for current and past smoker classes improved from 0.43 to 0.81 and 0.71 to 0.91, respectively. Non-smoker and unknown-class F-measures were 0.96 and 0.98, respectively. Keyword grouping had no negative effect on performance, and decreased training time. Grouping keywords is a practical method to reduce training corpus size.
15
Chih-Chung Chang, Chih‐Jen Lin · ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology · 2011 · 41.3K citations
Guergana Savova, James Masanz, Philip V. Ogren et al. · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2010 · 2K citations · Full text
P. Lassen, Jesper Grau Eriksen, Stephen Hamilton‐Dutoit et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2009 · 610 citations