Psychological Methods · 2006 · 177 citations · 35 references
Social SciencesBiostatisticsPsychologyChild DevelopmentDevelopmental PsychologyPsychometricsLatent Variable ModelingLongitudinal Data AnalysisLongitudinal ResearchPower AnalysisGrowth Curve ModelsGrowth CurvesInterindividual VariationSample Size CalculationSample Size EstimationStatistical PowerStatistical Power AnalysisStatistical Power Estimation
We evaluated the statistical power of single-indicator latent growth curve models (LGCMs) to detect correlated change between two variables (covariance of slopes) as a function of sample size, number of longitudinal measurement occasions, and reliability (measurement error variance). Power approximations following the method of Satorra and Saris (1985) were used to evaluate the power to detect slope covariances. Even with large samples (N = 500) and several longitudinal occasions (4 or 5), statistical power to detect covariance of slopes was moderate to low unless growth curve reliability at study onset was above .90. Studies using LGCMs may fail to detect slope correlations because of low power rather than a lack of relationship of change between variables. The present findings allow researchers to make more informed design decisions when planning a longitudinal study and aid in interpreting LGCM results regarding correlated interindividual differences in rates of development.
35
Testing Structural Equation Models.
Clifford C. Clogg, Kenneth A. Bollen, J. Scott Long · Social Forces · 1995 · 8.3K citations
Sample size in factor analysis.
Robert C. MacCallum, Keith F. Widaman, Shaobo Zhang et al. · Psychological Methods · 1999 · 4.8K citations
The earth is round (p < .05).
Jacob Cohen · American Psychologist · 1994 · 3.9K citations
Regional Brain Changes in Aging Healthy Adults: General Trends, Individual Differences and Modifiers
Naftali Raz, Ulman Lindenberger, Karen M. Rodrigue et al. · Cerebral Cortex · 2005 · 2.9K citations · Full text
Education, Neuroscience, Aging +13