Publication | Open Access
Protective activity of propofol, Diprivan<sup>®</sup> and intralipid against active oxygen species
65
Citations
33
References
1998
Year
Redox SignalingMolecular PharmacologyOxysterolEndothelial CellsBiochemistryMedicineLipid PeroxidationPhysiologyStimulated PmnEndothelial DysfunctionToxicologyVascular BiologyReactive Oxygen SpecieProtective ActivityPharmacologyRedox BiologyActive Oxygen SpeciesOxidative Stress
We separately studied the antioxidant properties of propofol (PPF), Diprivan ® (the commercial form of PPF) and intralipid (IL) (the vehicle solution of PPF in Diprivan ® ) on active oxygen species produced by phorbol myristate acetate (10‐ 6 M)‐stimulated human polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMN: 5 × 10 5 cells/ assay), human endothelial cells (5 × 10 5 cells/assay) or cell‐free systems (NaOCl or H 2 O 2 /peroxidase systems), using luminol (10 -4 M)‐enhanced chemiluminescence (CL). We also studied the protective effects of Diprivan ® on endothelial cells submitted to an oxidant stress induced by H 2 O 2 /MPO system: cytotoxicity was assessed by the release of preincorporated 51 Cr. Propofol inhibited the CL produced by stimulated PMN in a dose dependent m anner (until 5 × 10 -5 M, a clinically relevant concentration), while Diprivan ® and IL were not dose‐dependent inhibitors. The CL produced by endothelial cells was dosedependently inhibited by Diprivan ® and PPF, and weakly by IL (not dose‐dependent). In cell free systems, dose‐dependent inhibitions were obtained for the three products with a lower effect for IL. Diprivan ® efficaciously protected endothelial cells submitted to an oxidant stress, while IL was ineffective. By HPLC, we demonstrated that PPF was not incorporated into the cells. The drug thus acted by scavenging the active oxygen species released in the extracellular medium. IL acted in the same manner, but was a less powerful antioxidant.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1