Decision Making in Complex Naval Command-and-Control Environments

George L. Kaempf, Gary Klein, Marvin L. Thordsen

Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society · 1996 · 193 citations · 10 references

Concepts

TL;DR

The study investigates how experienced naval officers make decisions in the time‑pressured command‑and‑control environment of an AEGIS cruiser’s Combat Information Center, with implications for problem framing, situational awareness, and decision‑support design. Findings show that officers’ decisions followed the recognition‑primed decision model, relying mainly on situation‑awareness strategies such as feature matching and story generation to identify appropriate actions (95% of decisions) and rarely comparing multiple options (4%).

Abstract

This paper presents the findings of a study on how experienced naval officers make decisions in a complex, time-pressured command and control setting, the Combat Information Center of AEGIS cruisers. The decision processes invoked by the officers were consistent with the recognition-primed decision model. The majority of decisions concerned situation awareness and diagnosis in which the decision makers used feature-matching and story generation strategies to build situation awareness. Furthermore, awareness of the situation enabled the officers to recognize appropriate actions from published procedures or past experience. A recognitional strategy was used to identify 95% of the actions taken; decision makers compared multiple options in only 4% of the cases. These findings are discussed in terms of their implications for framing command-and-control problems, for emphasizing situation awareness, for a descriptive model of decision making, and for designing decision supports.

References

10