Shared System for Ordering Small and Large Numbers in Monkeys and Humans

Jessica F. Cantlon, Elizabeth M. Brannon

Psychological Science · 2006 · 553 citations · 21 references

Concepts

TL;DR

Animals, like adult humans and possibly infants, appear to share a system that represents objective numbers as psychological magnitudes analogous to the quantities they denote. The study directly compared human and monkey performance on an identical ordinal comparison task. Rhesus monkeys extended a rule learned with 1–9 to 10, 15, 20, and 30, indicating no upper limit, and across the range accuracy and latency were governed by value ratios; the strong qualitative and quantitative similarity between monkeys and humans supports a single nonverbal, evolutionarily primitive mechanism for representing and comparing numerical values.

Abstract

There is increasing evidence that animals share with adult humans and perhaps human infants a system for representing objective number as psychological magnitudes that are an analogue of the quantities they represent. Here we show that rhesus monkeys can extend a numerical rule learned with the values 1 through 9 to the values 10, 15, 20, and 30, which suggests that there is no upper limit on a monkey's numerical capacity. Instead, throughout the numerical range tested, both accuracy and latency in ordering two numerical values were systematically controlled by the ratio of the values compared. In a second experiment, we directly compared humans' and monkeys' performance in the same ordinal comparison task. The qualitative and quantitative similarity in their performance provides the strongest evidence to date of a single nonverbal, evolutionarily primitive mechanism for representing and comparing numerical values.

References

21