Publication | Open Access
Strengthening State Capabilities: The Role of Financial Incentives in the Call to Public Service*
551
Citations
70
References
2013
Year
EducationRecent Recruitment DrivePolicy AnalysisPublic-private PartnershipHuman Capital DevelopmentPublic Sector PositionsExperimental EconomicsLabor Market IntegrationPublic PolicyEconomicsState CapabilitiesPublic ExpenditurePublic Service MotivationLabor Market OutcomeCandidate SelectionLabor EconomicsFinancial IncentivesPublic FinanceWorkforce DevelopmentPublic SectorBusinessLabor Market Impact
The study examines a recent public sector recruitment drive in Mexico. The authors aim to experimentally estimate how financial incentives influence applicant quality, labor supply elasticity, and the impact of job attributes on vacancy filling. They randomized salary announcements across recruitment sites, offered jobs randomly, screened applicants with exams on intellectual ability, personality, and motivation, and used a theoretical job‑application model to guide analysis. Higher wages attracted more qualified applicants, increased acceptance rates (elasticity ≈ 2), and mitigated the negative effect of distance and poor municipal conditions, with no evidence of adverse selection on motivation.
Abstract We study a recent recruitment drive for public sector positions in Mexico. Different salaries were announced randomly across recruitment sites, and job offers were subsequently randomized. Screening relied on exams designed to measure applicants’ intellectual ability, personality, and motivation. This allows the first experimental estimates of (1) the role of financial incentives in attracting a larger and more qualified pool of applicants, (2) the elasticity of the labor supply facing the employer, and (3) the role of job attributes (distance, attractiveness of the municipal environment) in helping fill vacancies, as well as the role of wages in helping fill positions in less attractive municipalities. A theoretical model of job applications and acceptance guides the empirical inquiry. We find that higher wages attract more able applicants as measured by their IQ, personality, and proclivity toward public sector work—that is, we find no evidence of adverse selection effects on motivation; higher wage offers also increased acceptance rates, implying a labor supply elasticity of around 2 and some degree of monopsony power. Distance and worse municipal characteristics strongly decrease acceptance rates, but higher wages help bridge the recruitment gap in worse municipalities.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1