ICES Journal of Marine Science · 1996 · 223 citations · 12 references
Natural SciencesFisheriesAcousticsOcean AcousticsUnderwater AcousticsAcoustic MeasurementAcoustic SensingShallow-water AcousticsUnderwater Sound PropagationAcoustic Monitoring Of FishAcoustic Survey EstimationEcho Sounder ApplicationsEcho SoundingSamplingSeabed CharacterizationSignalsUnderwater Acoustic Signal Processing
Acoustic surveys of demersal fish are hindered by pulse–seabed interactions and fish movement away from the vessel’s direct path caused by the emitted noise. This study investigates how acoustic sampling volumes near the seabed, discrimination between fish and seabed echoes, and the depth anomaly affect fish detection. The authors define the acoustic deadzone and its volume, describe signal‑processing techniques for seabed recognition and protection of fish signals, and develop equations for the echo‑integrator deadzone—including acoustic deadzone, backstep zone, and partial integration zone—to calculate effective volume and correct estimation errors. An example demonstrates that when the bottom‑recognition system partially fails, the echo‑integrator output can be corrected using the derived equations.
There are particular difficulties in making acoustic estimates of the abundance of demersal and semi-demersal fish. One possibility which exists in any survey situation is that the fish may move from the direct path of the vessel because of the noise it is radiating. However, the problems addressed here are primarily due to the physical characteristics of the transmitted acoustic pulse from the echo-sounder and its interaction with fish close to the seabed. This paper looks at the factors controlling the detection of these fish in terms of the acoustic sampling volumes near the bottom, the discrimination theoretically possible between fish and seabed echoes and the “depth anomaly”. The acoustic deadzone is defined and its volume is determined. Practical aspects of signal processing in this near seabed situation are then described, including seabed recognition and safeguarding fish signals from contamination by the bottom echo and from noise. Next, an echo-integrator deadzone comprising the acoustic deadzone, the backstep zone, and the partial integration zone (related to pulse length) is described and defined. Equations for calculating the effective volume or effective height of this deadzone are developed. Estimation errors due to the echo-integrator deadzone are investigated and equations derived for the necessary corrections. An example is shown of partial failure of the bottom recognition system and how the echo integrator result can be corrected to compensate.
12
Underwater noise of research vessels: review and recommendations
Figshare · 1995 · 136 citations
The Bergen Echo Integrator: an introduction
Hans Knudsen · ICES Journal of Marine Science · 1990 · 107 citations · Full text