JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · 2000 · 90 citations · 45 references
MedicineGeneticsOncologyCancer ScreeningCost-effectiveness AnalysisGenetic CounselingClinical TrialsClinical Trials In OncologyGenetic Counseling In FamiliesPsychosocial CounselingBreast Cancer HistoryControl Group DesignFamilial Breast CancerFamily History-based ScreeningGenetic Test UtilizationGenetic TestingMatched Control GroupSurgical Service Utilization
BACKGROUND: Because of the growing demand for genetic assessment, there is an urgent need for information about what services are appropriate for women with a family history of breast cancer. Our purpose was to compare the psychologic impact and costs of a multidisciplinary genetic and surgical assessment service with those of current service provisions. METHODS: We carried out a prospective randomized trial of surgical consultation with (the trial group) and without (the control group) genetic assessment in 1000 women with a family history of breast cancer. All P: values are from two-sided tests. RESULTS: Although statistically significantly greater improvement in knowledge about breast cancer was found in the trial group (P: =.05), differences between groups in other psychologic outcomes were not statistically significant. Women in both groups experienced statistically significant reductions in anxiety and found attending the clinics to be highly satisfying. An initial specialist genetic assessment cost pound 14.27 (U.S. $22.55) more than a consultation with a breast surgeon. Counseling and genetic testing of affected relatives, plus subsequent testing of family members of affected relatives identified as mutation carriers, raised the total extra direct and indirect costs per woman in the trial group to pound 60.98 (U.S. $96.35) over costs for the control subjects. CONCLUSIONS: There may be little benefit in providing specialist genetics services to all women with a family history of breast cancer. Further investigation of factors that may mediate the impact of genetic assessment is in progress and may reveal subgroups of women who would benefit from specialist genetics services.
45
A Strong Candidate for the Breast and Ovarian Cancer Susceptibility Gene <i>BRCA1</i>
Yoshio Miki, Jeffrey Swensen, Donna Shattuck-Eidens et al. · Science · 1994 · 6.1K citations
Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook
Albert E. Beaton, Geoffrey Keppel · American Educational Research Journal · 1975 · 5.9K citations
Arts, Design, Design Theory +3
The American Journal of Human Genetics
J. S. · Population · 1950 · 5.1K citations
Life Sciences, Biology, Genetics +4
Linkage of Early-Onset Familial Breast Cancer to Chromosome 17q21
Jeff Hall, Ming K. Lee, Beth Newman et al. · Science · 1990 · 2.5K citations