Publication | Closed Access
Why does vantage point affect boundary extension?
13
Citations
42
References
2010
Year
Scene AnalysisEngineeringGeometryVisual Cognitive NeuroscienceBoundary LayerSocial SciencesLow-level VisionImage AnalysisVisual CognitionPlate BoundaryImage-based ModelingMemoryMain ObjectCognitive ScienceTest BoundariesComputer Vision3D VisionScene InterpretationScene UnderstandingSpatial CognitionView Boundaries
To determine if layout affects boundary extension (BE; false memory beyond view boundaries; Intraub & Richardson, 1989), 12 single-object scenes were photographed from three vantage points: central (0°), shifted rightward (45°), and shifted leftward (45°). Size and position of main objects were held constant. Pictures were presented for 15 s each and were repeated at test with their boundaries: (a) displaced inward or outward (Experiment 1: N=120), or (b) identical to the stimulus views (Experiment 2: N=72). When participants adjusted test boundaries to match memory, BE always occurred, but tended to be smaller for 45° views. We propose this reflects the fact that more of the 3-D scene is visible in the 45° views. This suggests that scene representation reflects the 3-D world conveyed by the global characteristics of layout, rather than the 2-D distance between the main object and the boundaries of a picture.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1