Publication | Closed Access
Monitoring Energy Calibration Drift Using the Scintillator Background Radiation
18
Citations
6
References
2011
Year
EngineeringNuclear PhysicsMeasurementNuclear DataCalibrationNuclear MaterialsInstrumentationRadiation OncologyNuclear MedicineRadiologyHealth SciencesRadiation DetectionRadiological SciencesScintillatorCalibration DriftScintillator Background RadiationSensor CalibrationExperimental Nuclear PhysicsOther LanthanumDetector Calibration Drift
Scintillating materials commonly used in nuclear medicine can contain traces of isotopes that naturally emit gamma or beta radiation. Examples of these are <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">138</sup> La contained in LaBr <sub xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">3</sub> and other Lanthanum based scintillators, and <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">176</sup> Lu contained in LSO, LYSO, LuYAP and other Lutetium based scintillators. In particular, <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">176</sup> Lu decays into <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">176</sup> Hf and emits a beta particle with maximum energy 589 keV, and a cascade of gamma rays of energies 307 keV, 202 keV and 88 keV. We propose to use the background radiation for monitoring of detector calibration drift and for self-calibration of detectors in complex detector systems. A calibration drift due to random or systematic changes in photomultiplier tube (PMT) gain was studied in a Siemens PET scanner, based on LSO blocks. Both a conventional radioactive source ( <sup xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">68</sup> Ge, 511 keV photons from electron-positron annihilation) and the LSO background radiation were used for calibration. The difference in the calibration peak shift at 511 keV estimated with the two methods was less than 10%.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1