Breaching the Security of the Kaiser Permanente Internet Patient Portal: the Organizational Foundations of Information Security

Jeff Collmann, Ted Cooper

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · 2007 · 53 citations · 10 references

DOIFull text

Open access

Concepts

TL;DR

This case study examines a breach of confidential health information for over 800 Kaiser Permanente members via the KP Online portal. The authors used qualitative interviews, incident reports, root‑cause analyses, and media reports to investigate the breach. The breach stemmed from system architecture, staff motivations, and cultural differences, none of which were formal security violations, indicating that protecting patient data requires creating safe organizational contexts alongside regulatory compliance.

Abstract

This case study describes and analyzes a breach of the confidentiality and integrity of personally identified health information (e.g. appointment details, answers to patients' questions, medical advice) for over 800 Kaiser Permanente (KP) members through KP Online, a web-enabled health care portal. The authors obtained and analyzed multiple types of qualitative data about this incident including interviews with KP staff, incident reports, root cause analyses, and media reports. Reasons at multiple levels account for the breach, including the architecture of the information system, the motivations of individual staff members, and differences among the subcultures of individual groups within as well as technical and social relations across the Kaiser IT program. None of these reasons could be classified, strictly speaking, as "security violations." " This case study, thus, suggests that, to protect sensitive patient information, health care organizations should build safe organizational contexts for complex health information systems in addition to complying with good information security practice and regulations such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) of 1996.

References

10