Publication | Closed Access
Intra aortic ballon pumping in myocardial infarction and unstable angina
17
Citations
32
References
1980
Year
HypertensionHeart FailureCardiac AnaesthesiaRefractory AnginaAcute Myocardial InfarctionVascular SurgeryCardiologyAtherosclerosisCardiothoracic SurgeryMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionCatheter InsertionCardiogenic ShockCardiovascular DiseaseRefractory IschaemiaCardiovascular PhysiologyMedicineEmergency MedicineAnesthesiology
From 1972 to 1979 intra aortic balloon pumping (IABP) was attempted in 181 patients; catheter insertion failed in 13 (8%). More complications occurred with prolonged treatment but all three lethal complications (2%) were related to catheter insertion. Seventy-six patients had clinical cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction (CSMI). Haemodynamically, 23 were classified as preshock: 15 (66%) could be weaned, 12 (53%) survived over 3 months; whereas only 27/51 patients (51%) haemodynamically classified as shock could be weaned and 21 (40%) survived over 3 months. Of forty-two patients with refractory angina at rest, 41 had prompt relief of pain after IABP, and subsequently underwent coronary artery bypasss grafting (CABG). Perioperative infarction rate was 8% (4/41), perioperative mortality was 7% (3/41). Total infarction rate was 11% (5/42), and total mortality 7% (3/41). Pain relief was prompt in 14/17 patients (82%) with refractory angina after infarction. Pain persisted in three patients: all three sustained an infarction, one died. Two patients were excluded from surgery. Twelve patients underwent CABG; none died, none developed MI. In eight patients persistence of pain suggested a slowly evolving MI, IABP abolished pain in seven. Conclusion: IABP has demonstrated its efficacy both in pump failure and in refractory ischaemia. However, its use is not without risks.
| Year | Citations | |
|---|---|---|
Page 1
Page 1