Head & Neck · 2007 · 149 citations · 20 references
MedicineOncologyRadiologyDiagnostic RadiologyOncologic ImagingTreatment PlanningCancer DiagnosisPositron Emission TomographyRadiation TherapySquamous Cell CarcinomaTherapy Response AssessmentTumor DetectionIncremental Diagnostic ValueOncologic Pet ImagingPet-computed TomographyPositron Emission Tomography PrognosisRadiotherapy Dose PlanningStratificationTherapy Response EvaluationTreatment Response Criteria
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to determine prospectively the incremental value of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) over conventional assessment (clinical examination and CT/MRI imaging). METHODS: All patients undergoing (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT for primary head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma between January 2002 and December 2003 (inclusive) were included in this study provided they had undergone contemporaneous conventional assessment of the head and neck region and had 12 months minimum follow-up. RESULTS: Seventy-six patients underwent 100 PET/CT scans. The majority of patients (74%) were treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. Median follow-up time was 28 months. PET/CT led to a TNM classification alteration in 34% (12/35), a change in radiotherapy planning technique and/or dose in 29% (10/35), and altered treatment response assessment in 43% (13/30). A complete metabolic response was predictive of overall survival (p = .037). CONCLUSION: Our results support incorporation of PET/CT into the management paradigm of head and neck mucosal squamous cell carcinoma.
20
Gerald Antoch, Nina Saoudi, Hilmar Kuehl et al. · Journal of Clinical Oncology · 2004 · 435 citations
Head and Neck Cancer: Clinical Usefulness and Accuracy of PET/CT Image Fusion
Heiko Schöder, Henry Yeung, Mithat Gönen et al. · Radiology · 2004 · 393 citations
Head and Neck Malignancy: Is PET/CT More Accurate than PET or CT Alone?
Barton F. Branstetter, Todd M. Blodgett, Lee A. Zimmer et al. · Radiology · 2005 · 331 citations