Microsurgery · 2011 · 111 citations · 25 references
MedicinePlastic SurgerySurgeryBiomedical ImagingMicrosurgeryReconstructive SurgeryFlap MonitoringFlap ReconstructionFlap SalvageFlap SurgeryPatient MonitoringTelemedicineAccuracyFlap Re-explorationFlap Viability MonitoringFree Flap HarvestingMean Response TimeRemote Monitoring SystemsRemote Surgical AssistanceResponse Time
This prospective study was designed to compare the accuracy rate between remote smartphone photographic assessments and in-person examinations for free flap monitoring. One hundred and three consecutive free flaps were monitored with in-person examinations and assessed remotely by three surgeons (Team A) via photographs transmitted over smartphone. Four other surgeons used the traditional in-person examinations as Team B. The response time to re-exploration was defined as the interval between when a flap was evaluated as compromised by the nurse/house officer and when the decision was made for re-exploration. The accuracy rate was 98.7% and 94.2% for in-person and smartphone photographic assessments, respectively. The response time of 8 ± 3 min in Team A was statistically shorter than the 180 ± 104 min in Team B (P = 0.01 by the Mann-Whitney test). The remote smartphone photography assessment has a comparable accuracy rate and shorter response time compared with in-person examination for free flap monitoring.
25
Free Flap Reexploration: Indications, Treatment, and Outcomes in 1193 Free Flaps
Duc T. Bui, Peter G. Cordeiro, Qunying Hu et al. · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 2007 · 540 citations
Medicine, Plastic Surgery, Surgery +17
Microsurgery Costs and Outcome
Tad R. Heinz, Patricia A. Cowper, Scott L. Levin · Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery · 1999 · 286 citations
Medicine, Plastic Surgery, Surgery +17